GRE考试解题思维综述—第三章阅读要诀(2)
时间：2019-02-05 作者：英语课 分类：英文语法词汇
英语课
下面再补充简单说一下如何训练阅读。我这里推荐的阅读方法，也是我一直以来孜孜以求的是全文阅读，从不跳读，我希望对于初学者一定要对首段和每段的首尾句仔细读，末段也不可忽视，其他的不可以不读，而是快读（当然前面说的推测的命题点不能快读！）。平时要有意识地进行读和记同时进行的训练，长文章争取在3分内读“好”（当然这是是记在大脑里，而不是记在纸上！），短文章在1.5——2分内搞定，题目平均每题一分钟。最后要强调的是阅读由于总是在GRE考试的最后来对付，尤其是长文章，所以时间紧张是必然的，但是紧张一定不能影响读文章的“有效性”，也就是阻止你“读好”，题目失误顶多是单个的问题，而一旦文章没读好，失误是“一片”的问题，所以对于阅读，心理素质的训练不可少。对于各种题型的解题方法，我的《2003爱一个美女好难》攻略中已经介绍得颇为详细，请读者具体详细参考，这里不再赘述。下面就一篇我多次示范的LSAT阅读来具体演示一下比较成熟和明智的阅读和作题技巧，请仔细临摹体会，并对照真题强加练习：
Directions: Each passage in this section is followed by a group of questions to be answered on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. For some of the questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question However, you are to choose the best answer that is the response that most accurately and completely answers the questions and blacken the corresponding space on your answer sheet.
Any study of autobiographical narratives that
appeared under the ostensible 1 authorship of
African American writers between 1760 and 1865
inevitably raises concerns about authenticity and
(5) interpretation. Should an autobiography whose
written composition was literally out of the hands
of its narrator be considered as the literary
equivalent of those autobiographies that were
authored independently by their subjects?
读完首句，知道是讲对于AA作家自传叙述的真实性和解释性两方面的置疑。注意ostensible我们马上知道作者的态度是“怀疑”和“否定”。接着2句提出论点：两种自传体是否等价？不用说了，等价还写什么狗屁文章来探讨？肯定不等价！好，那么开始推理，不等价有三种情况：1.A比B好；2.A比B差；3.A有时比B好，有时比B差，需另加外部条件限制。好了，很简单的推理吧！下面我们就看作者想要表达的是上面3种的哪一种了？首段只要想到这个层面，我想下面的内容就可以读得飞快，因为我们心中已经有谱，主旨已经把握，按照“边读——边想——边记”原则，我们在3秒钟之内想清楚要考主旨题，答案特征就是上述3种结论中的一种。
Directions: Each passage in this section is followed by a group of questions to be answered on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. For some of the questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question However, you are to choose the best answer that is the response that most accurately and completely answers the questions and blacken the corresponding space on your answer sheet.
Any study of autobiographical narratives that
appeared under the ostensible 1 authorship of
African American writers between 1760 and 1865
inevitably raises concerns about authenticity and
(5) interpretation. Should an autobiography whose
written composition was literally out of the hands
of its narrator be considered as the literary
equivalent of those autobiographies that were
authored independently by their subjects?
读完首句，知道是讲对于AA作家自传叙述的真实性和解释性两方面的置疑。注意ostensible我们马上知道作者的态度是“怀疑”和“否定”。接着2句提出论点：两种自传体是否等价？不用说了，等价还写什么狗屁文章来探讨？肯定不等价！好，那么开始推理，不等价有三种情况：1.A比B好；2.A比B差；3.A有时比B好，有时比B差，需另加外部条件限制。好了，很简单的推理吧！下面我们就看作者想要表达的是上面3种的哪一种了？首段只要想到这个层面，我想下面的内容就可以读得飞快，因为我们心中已经有谱，主旨已经把握，按照“边读——边想——边记”原则，我们在3秒钟之内想清楚要考主旨题，答案特征就是上述3种结论中的一种。
adj.(指理由)表面的，假装的
- The ostensible reason wasn't the real reason.表面上的理由并不是真正的理由。
- He resigned secretaryship on the ostensible ground of health.他借口身体不好，辞去书记的职务。