GRE考试解题思维综述—第三章阅读要诀(4)
时间：2019-02-05 作者：英语课 分类：英文语法词汇
英语课
Transcribed narratives in which an editor
explicitly delimits his or her role undoubtedly may
(40) be regarded as more authentic and reflective of the
narrator’s thought in action than those edited
works that flesh out a statement of facts in ways
unaccounted for. Still, it would be na?ve to accord
dictated oral narratives the same status as
(45) autobiographies composed and written by the
subjects of the stories themselves. This point is
illustrated by an analysis of Works Progress
Administration interviews with ex-slaves in the
1930s that suggests that narrators often told
(50) interviewers what they seemed to want to hear. If
it seemed impolitic for former slaves to tell all they
knew and thought about the past to interviewers in
the 1930s, the same could be said of escaped slaves
on the run in the antebellum era. Dictated narratives
(55) therefore, are literary texts whose authenticity is
difficult to determine. Analysis should reserve close
analytic readings for independently authored texts.
Discussion of collaborative texts should take into句，
(60) production.
3段一开头作者给出的是more authentic and reflective的正评价，作者态度肯定是负的，那么不用问又是让步。等什么呢？强转折词呗！果然，后面接着43行出现了期待已久的Still，作者开始否定上述提出的观点，说这种将两者等价的说法是na?ve的，否定观点不言而喻！然后举例支持上述观点，拿WPA的例子，好！要是考in order to题，那么答案一定是说两样事物的不等价，不是the same status！后句作了个比较，其中有个僻词antebellum，知道什么意思吗？不知道，我告诉你……我也不知道。我不能查词典，但我知道这句话就是上句的同义转述，跟上句意思肯定是一样的。由If可知一定是反着将上句说了一遍。好！我们可以看到由下句的therefore知道作者的结论来了，屏气凝神，看看作者的结论是3个中的哪个。哦！原来是“难于决定”。下面是should即判断句，可能靠细节题，注意对象与细节特征词，发现是close analytic readings和independently.然后作者发现是为什么“难于决定”呢？作者说要考虑conditions！好了，主旨就是第3种结论，看情况决定A的地位！读完了文章，我们已经对所有的细节与层次结构了然于胸，1段作者提出论点，指出就两个角度讨论，然后2段开始批判authenticity的等价性，3段开始批判interpretation的等价性，最后作者提出结论3！整篇文章是“问题解决型”。弄清了之后，来吧，我们开始解题！争取30秒一个，我们刚才通读是花了4分钟左右。后面的题给的比较规范。
explicitly delimits his or her role undoubtedly may
(40) be regarded as more authentic and reflective of the
narrator’s thought in action than those edited
works that flesh out a statement of facts in ways
unaccounted for. Still, it would be na?ve to accord
dictated oral narratives the same status as
(45) autobiographies composed and written by the
subjects of the stories themselves. This point is
illustrated by an analysis of Works Progress
Administration interviews with ex-slaves in the
1930s that suggests that narrators often told
(50) interviewers what they seemed to want to hear. If
it seemed impolitic for former slaves to tell all they
knew and thought about the past to interviewers in
the 1930s, the same could be said of escaped slaves
on the run in the antebellum era. Dictated narratives
(55) therefore, are literary texts whose authenticity is
difficult to determine. Analysis should reserve close
analytic readings for independently authored texts.
Discussion of collaborative texts should take into句，
(60) production.
3段一开头作者给出的是more authentic and reflective的正评价，作者态度肯定是负的，那么不用问又是让步。等什么呢？强转折词呗！果然，后面接着43行出现了期待已久的Still，作者开始否定上述提出的观点，说这种将两者等价的说法是na?ve的，否定观点不言而喻！然后举例支持上述观点，拿WPA的例子，好！要是考in order to题，那么答案一定是说两样事物的不等价，不是the same status！后句作了个比较，其中有个僻词antebellum，知道什么意思吗？不知道，我告诉你……我也不知道。我不能查词典，但我知道这句话就是上句的同义转述，跟上句意思肯定是一样的。由If可知一定是反着将上句说了一遍。好！我们可以看到由下句的therefore知道作者的结论来了，屏气凝神，看看作者的结论是3个中的哪个。哦！原来是“难于决定”。下面是should即判断句，可能靠细节题，注意对象与细节特征词，发现是close analytic readings和independently.然后作者发现是为什么“难于决定”呢？作者说要考虑conditions！好了，主旨就是第3种结论，看情况决定A的地位！读完了文章，我们已经对所有的细节与层次结构了然于胸，1段作者提出论点，指出就两个角度讨论，然后2段开始批判authenticity的等价性，3段开始批判interpretation的等价性，最后作者提出结论3！整篇文章是“问题解决型”。弄清了之后，来吧，我们开始解题！争取30秒一个，我们刚才通读是花了4分钟左右。后面的题给的比较规范。