时间:2018-12-20 作者:英语课 分类:CNN美国有线新闻2018年5月


英语课

 


AZUZ: A former U.S. Supreme Court justice is calling for a major change to the U.S. constitution and his suggestion has stirred up debate and controversy across America. Former Justice John Paul Stevens served on the high court from 1975 until he retired in 2010.


He recently wrote an opinion essay that was published this week in "The New York Times". In it, he said the demonstrators who participated in last weekend's March for Our Lives events should go a step further than demanding new restrictions on gun ownership in America. He said that they should demand a repeal of the Second Amendment.


That part of the U.S. Constitution says this: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.


Stevens, in line with what many gun control advocates argue, suggests that the Second Amendment is talking about militias having the right to bear arms, and he says, quote, that concern is a relic of the 18th century. But in 2008, the Supreme Court established that the Second Amendment applies to the individuals' right to bear arms, in line with what many gun rights advocates argue.


Former Justice Stevens was on the Supreme Court at the time of that ruling. He was among those who dissented or disagreed with it.


Stevens wrote that repealing the Second Amendment altogether would make it easier to create new gun restrictions.


U.S. President Donald Trump who himself has called for some new restrictions on buying guns and certain gun components responded that the Second Amendment would never be repealed. The White House says that the nation should focus on getting weapons away from dangerous people but not on, quote, blocking all Americans from their constitutional rights.


And Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress, even those who support new gun restrictions have indicated they also support the Second Amendment.


The U.S. Constitution has been amended 27 times since it was signed in 1787. Experts say it's very difficult to do. And even if Congress or the individual states met the threshold for a new amendment or a constitutional convention, it's still take three-fourths of the states to ratify any changes to the Constitution. None of its first 10 amendments has ever been repealed or changed.



学英语单词
all-weather operability
appertainance
assigned summer freeboard
astreus hygrometricuss
baroport
bath stone
big with news
Bilozerske
bitemporalis hemianopsia
blendo
boiler deposit
Buelau's method
bullinger
calcium pantothenate
canaan pk.
categorial
chromatographic theory
Chu Ki-chol
clastic limestone
clay crucible
collision bulkhead
comital
complete equipment for production of alcohol
concentric squirrel cage mill
contaminated
contor
control valve plug
controlled valency
cruise attitude
d'oyly
despera
developing capacity
Donje Crnjelovo
ellipsometry
episternums
erevans
evenflo
Flow Meters
gene sequence
geoblocking
grey sheeting
H-shape steel
hamdog
Holice
horizontally split connecting rod
hypoelectrolytemia
influenza pneumonia
inspection clause
intracytoplasm
Kamyshnoye
Kuwayt, Jūn al
licopyranocoumarin
life or limb
light heavy weight
lindt
liquid waste discharge pump
low-frequency impedance
lump parameter
magnetospectrograph
makes for
Mankes
marine telephone set
middling product
multiple regressing
nasal bone
Nduru
nonmason
nontotemic
opened end
operator algebra
originality and device
pea leafminer
Pecos Plains
pignatelli
polytone
portable tea pruning machine
pre-investments
pro-Allied
rational cohomology group
registered ship
rock-hopping
room-dry condition
rotating service structure
rough bearded grass
shape for crossing ferry
sheath-reshaping converter
siltier
simazin
sonic carburetion
stiffening diaphragm
stuck in my heart
subfornical organ (sfo)
thorium lead age method
tidal current scour
to move on
tower-type batch plant
uncancerous
well counter
wet-looks
word-strings
yttrium oxalate