时间:2018-12-20 作者:英语课 分类:CNN美国有线新闻2018年5月


英语课

 


AZUZ: A former U.S. Supreme Court justice is calling for a major change to the U.S. constitution and his suggestion has stirred up debate and controversy across America. Former Justice John Paul Stevens served on the high court from 1975 until he retired in 2010.


He recently wrote an opinion essay that was published this week in "The New York Times". In it, he said the demonstrators who participated in last weekend's March for Our Lives events should go a step further than demanding new restrictions on gun ownership in America. He said that they should demand a repeal of the Second Amendment.


That part of the U.S. Constitution says this: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.


Stevens, in line with what many gun control advocates argue, suggests that the Second Amendment is talking about militias having the right to bear arms, and he says, quote, that concern is a relic of the 18th century. But in 2008, the Supreme Court established that the Second Amendment applies to the individuals' right to bear arms, in line with what many gun rights advocates argue.


Former Justice Stevens was on the Supreme Court at the time of that ruling. He was among those who dissented or disagreed with it.


Stevens wrote that repealing the Second Amendment altogether would make it easier to create new gun restrictions.


U.S. President Donald Trump who himself has called for some new restrictions on buying guns and certain gun components responded that the Second Amendment would never be repealed. The White House says that the nation should focus on getting weapons away from dangerous people but not on, quote, blocking all Americans from their constitutional rights.


And Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress, even those who support new gun restrictions have indicated they also support the Second Amendment.


The U.S. Constitution has been amended 27 times since it was signed in 1787. Experts say it's very difficult to do. And even if Congress or the individual states met the threshold for a new amendment or a constitutional convention, it's still take three-fourths of the states to ratify any changes to the Constitution. None of its first 10 amendments has ever been repealed or changed.



学英语单词
ABEOJ (abnormal end of job)
achiral reagent
adipocytokines
age dependency ratio
ain draham
alcocero de mola
Anemone lutienensis
articles of Religion
axile chloroplast
azoted
bell glass
biacene
bigotted
blowtubes
captive finance companies
Cedarmont
chaffweeds
cock pilots
coldrex
comonoids
complete round
creep life
customs bill of sight
detection of dislocation
direct fertilizers
diversity channel
dog ticket
donkey service
dose
ewe in lamb
Eyota
flue gas fan
Fluorofur
food-truck
fore-and-aft plane
foreign interference
french lawn
funnel draft
geological environment
globoid cam
GM_comparison-clauses-bigger-than-we-had-imagined
granat
high-latitude
ice-box
impeller blade
individual morphology
intermediate flow mixer grid
intrinsic availability
israelites
Kamālia
KPE
Lister's tubercle
market share
Marstrander
masticatory muscles
methyl biphenyl
multicoitic species
myll-
near surface vehicle
nissy
oasy
oblique incidence transmission
organoplasty
oxygen point apparatus
P. & B.
pan-climax
percentage of deviation
philosophistic
Phyllostachys nigra Munro
pneumatic teletransmitter
poudagre
pre-theatres
preference clause
priority indicators
pro-gaier
public footpath
quadragesimas
racephedrine
raninids
rate of enrichment
receptoral
Saulxures-sur-Moselotte
secondary standard of measurement
seeber
semiconductor material science
severe mediterranean anemia
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin
slot aileron
static equation systems
still-present
stilling
sulodexide
synthetic rice
thromsthenia
tolerance on rated resistance
toy chest
two way cylinder
unpractic
Veronica sibirica L.
wilkinsburg
winch frame
worm wheel hob