时间:2018-12-20 作者:英语课 分类:CNN美国有线新闻2018年5月


英语课

 


AZUZ: A former U.S. Supreme Court justice is calling for a major change to the U.S. constitution and his suggestion has stirred up debate and controversy across America. Former Justice John Paul Stevens served on the high court from 1975 until he retired in 2010.


He recently wrote an opinion essay that was published this week in "The New York Times". In it, he said the demonstrators who participated in last weekend's March for Our Lives events should go a step further than demanding new restrictions on gun ownership in America. He said that they should demand a repeal of the Second Amendment.


That part of the U.S. Constitution says this: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.


Stevens, in line with what many gun control advocates argue, suggests that the Second Amendment is talking about militias having the right to bear arms, and he says, quote, that concern is a relic of the 18th century. But in 2008, the Supreme Court established that the Second Amendment applies to the individuals' right to bear arms, in line with what many gun rights advocates argue.


Former Justice Stevens was on the Supreme Court at the time of that ruling. He was among those who dissented or disagreed with it.


Stevens wrote that repealing the Second Amendment altogether would make it easier to create new gun restrictions.


U.S. President Donald Trump who himself has called for some new restrictions on buying guns and certain gun components responded that the Second Amendment would never be repealed. The White House says that the nation should focus on getting weapons away from dangerous people but not on, quote, blocking all Americans from their constitutional rights.


And Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress, even those who support new gun restrictions have indicated they also support the Second Amendment.


The U.S. Constitution has been amended 27 times since it was signed in 1787. Experts say it's very difficult to do. And even if Congress or the individual states met the threshold for a new amendment or a constitutional convention, it's still take three-fourths of the states to ratify any changes to the Constitution. None of its first 10 amendments has ever been repealed or changed.



学英语单词
addleness
all channel network
alternating current (ac)
anticoyote
audit regulations
bending iron
calliphora vicinas
Cayratia fugongensis
chore
closure of gastrojejunocolic fistula
codelcoes
connector bend
consonant chord
curry sauce
deliberate intention
denturists
direct sum of Lie algebras
draconi
east malaysias
Eglaim
electric power source
epoxidised linseed oil
Erzenhausen
extraordinary reserve
feed vane
g-dep
gammil
GFLSA
GM_nationalities-languages-countries-and-regions
Grumento Nova
hanging rooms
help someone out
heneggs
homolecithal egg
honest to goodness
iguesterin
imino-glycin uria
implementation library
initiatino
instrument-maker
jigsawing
Juncus leschenaultii
kataphylaxis
kefala
kentishman
knot strength
leakance test
led aralog modulation
Leishman's stain
longus
love life
lutyte
maaroufs
Meliphagidae
memorial stone
micro-vacation
modified biquinary code
Molignant
Muller's tubercle
overmarketed
oxacycloheptatriene
painting robot
partial drop of pressure
patient-related
patrol airship
plasma fibrinogen
predetection
prediction data
radial dilution effect
rectoplasties
reflagged
rice-mill
scatter gap
scour-remnant ridge
sealed road
sends in
sergeants-major
shaggy heat
Silene nepalensis
single row bearing
slinger head
snoopily
solid loading
spiral-water turbine
St. John the Apostle
standard construction element
start stop supervisor
Stick of Chalk
swimming bell
tenaxin
three-dimensional seeing
time-multiplexed system
tiracizine
top fourth jewel
trace decay
tractor-maker
traditional form
trivia
tsdm
Wheel midship!
Wim
wrong claim