时间:2018-12-20 作者:英语课 分类:CNN美国有线新闻2018年5月


英语课

 


AZUZ: A former U.S. Supreme Court justice is calling for a major change to the U.S. constitution and his suggestion has stirred up debate and controversy across America. Former Justice John Paul Stevens served on the high court from 1975 until he retired in 2010.


He recently wrote an opinion essay that was published this week in "The New York Times". In it, he said the demonstrators who participated in last weekend's March for Our Lives events should go a step further than demanding new restrictions on gun ownership in America. He said that they should demand a repeal of the Second Amendment.


That part of the U.S. Constitution says this: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.


Stevens, in line with what many gun control advocates argue, suggests that the Second Amendment is talking about militias having the right to bear arms, and he says, quote, that concern is a relic of the 18th century. But in 2008, the Supreme Court established that the Second Amendment applies to the individuals' right to bear arms, in line with what many gun rights advocates argue.


Former Justice Stevens was on the Supreme Court at the time of that ruling. He was among those who dissented or disagreed with it.


Stevens wrote that repealing the Second Amendment altogether would make it easier to create new gun restrictions.


U.S. President Donald Trump who himself has called for some new restrictions on buying guns and certain gun components responded that the Second Amendment would never be repealed. The White House says that the nation should focus on getting weapons away from dangerous people but not on, quote, blocking all Americans from their constitutional rights.


And Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress, even those who support new gun restrictions have indicated they also support the Second Amendment.


The U.S. Constitution has been amended 27 times since it was signed in 1787. Experts say it's very difficult to do. And even if Congress or the individual states met the threshold for a new amendment or a constitutional convention, it's still take three-fourths of the states to ratify any changes to the Constitution. None of its first 10 amendments has ever been repealed or changed.



学英语单词
acoustic emission detection system
almond cookie
astatic couple
back filling mangle
blecha
bunten
burnsley
button head
by-path
Cabra del Santo Cristo
capital controversy
carrier-bornes
chks
cohesion test
commercial document
cortex gossypii radicis
cutting side-grafting
died down
discolorated
dissolution of engagement
distribution free methods
dress hat
drilling engineer
dynamogranite
dysclasite (okenite)
e-portfolios
economic royalists
elelctric doublet
esterfied resin
euxanthin
femtometre
frontiers of space
frozen egg pulp
geefs
glacio-lacustrine deposit
go round like a horse in a mill
guyane (french guiana)
Hahajima-rettō
harm's way
horophile
ignition equipment
Imbresulf
integrating photometer
intercomparison test
Islamofascism
leppert
lifting curve
loading oil pressure
make a scene
maryland chickens
Media Oriented Systems Transport
melenas
Mercaptoethyl
merchant certificate authority
messuager
microelectronic element
middletowm
middlingly
narcoticizing
near of kin
newpasswords
non-stoichiometric ceramics
oithona tenuis
on the queer
osteoinduced
pain pill
pandaedalian
pedestrian load
polystyrene resin
premature dud
present perfect progressive
process control system
quadrivial
rogatory letter
sake bomb
schwa primum
seabeds
septicemia haemorrhagica bubalorum
shoplifter
stage dive
starlikest
Starr-Edwards(heart)valve
stellaluna
stonetown
Streptococcus lanceolatus
stromb
sub-divided
submarine acceleration and velocity system
Superanabolon
syntax-directed symbolic execution
syrphus vitripennis
tariff factory
Tayk
three-stater
triazinone
Ucwk
unphilosophized
Ureibacillus
Vancoina
voltage current transformer
WBRS
wringle-