时间:2018-12-20 作者:英语课 分类:CNN美国有线新闻2018年5月


英语课

 


AZUZ: A former U.S. Supreme Court justice is calling for a major change to the U.S. constitution and his suggestion has stirred up debate and controversy across America. Former Justice John Paul Stevens served on the high court from 1975 until he retired in 2010.


He recently wrote an opinion essay that was published this week in "The New York Times". In it, he said the demonstrators who participated in last weekend's March for Our Lives events should go a step further than demanding new restrictions on gun ownership in America. He said that they should demand a repeal of the Second Amendment.


That part of the U.S. Constitution says this: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.


Stevens, in line with what many gun control advocates argue, suggests that the Second Amendment is talking about militias having the right to bear arms, and he says, quote, that concern is a relic of the 18th century. But in 2008, the Supreme Court established that the Second Amendment applies to the individuals' right to bear arms, in line with what many gun rights advocates argue.


Former Justice Stevens was on the Supreme Court at the time of that ruling. He was among those who dissented or disagreed with it.


Stevens wrote that repealing the Second Amendment altogether would make it easier to create new gun restrictions.


U.S. President Donald Trump who himself has called for some new restrictions on buying guns and certain gun components responded that the Second Amendment would never be repealed. The White House says that the nation should focus on getting weapons away from dangerous people but not on, quote, blocking all Americans from their constitutional rights.


And Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress, even those who support new gun restrictions have indicated they also support the Second Amendment.


The U.S. Constitution has been amended 27 times since it was signed in 1787. Experts say it's very difficult to do. And even if Congress or the individual states met the threshold for a new amendment or a constitutional convention, it's still take three-fourths of the states to ratify any changes to the Constitution. None of its first 10 amendments has ever been repealed or changed.



学英语单词
adult hypertrophic pyloristenosis
advance range
Amibarson
aristeromycin
aromatic properties
at wharf
bagnold effect
bathypelagicfish
birkins
block diagram system
bluewood
botulinus toxins
bouser
bronydom
candlefishes
Chenopodium gracilispicum
concealable
cross code generator
Dazhong
Derenburg
diaphoretic
direct drive robot
direct the jury
dollar accountability
electrodynamic force
ethology
exchange order
factualism
filling floor
firing line
floor plan merchandise policy
for hours together
frame-type switchboard
friendly nation
game-keepers
gargouillade vole
head meter
hexadecenoyl
hiatus Scarpa's
hole up
ippon
Joshua Fit the Battle of Jericho
katanosins
knowledge operationalization
late flowering
light and air
liquid scintillator activity meter
lock door cam
Lophodon
make room for sb.
mean tidal level
meliolina cladotricha
membrance
merten
micrometer value
microprogram address
microvilli
millinery felt
multi-source
narrow V belt
over-design
paleophytogeography
park-leaves
permeances
photocathode sensitivity
photograph index chart
pilsudski
pleonektite
pom-
precision teaching
psychosine
Puerto Jiménez
quantitative image analysis microscope
questionaire method
rapturize
rate of conversion
release the brake
rice weevils
Robin's sympexion
router isolation
ruck-up
sense-unit
slingings
spiro-amantadine
SQA (system queue area)
Sungguminasa
superlattices
surface action
terms of trust
text link
under false colors
unfreeable
velocity measure error
Wanganella
waste stream, wastestream
watchdog journalism
watercourse
wax stone
with one consent
world currency year book
WRCHK (write check)
zuclopenthixol