THE MAKING OF A NATION - The Great Impeachment Trial of Andr
时间:2019-01-26 作者:英语课 分类:The Making of a Nation
THE MAKING OF A NATION - The Great Impeachment 1 Trial of Andrew Johnson
By Frank Beardsley
Broadcast: Thursday, July 07, 2005
(MUSIC)
VOICE ONE:
THE MAKING OF A NATION -- a program in Special English.
(MUSIC)
Andrew Johnson
After America's Civil War ended in eighteen sixty-five, tensions grew between Congress and the President. Radical 2 members of the Republican Party controlled Congress. They wanted strong policies to punish the southern states who left the Union and were defeated. Standing 3 in their way was President Andrew Johnson, a Democrat 4.
Johnson opposed radical efforts to force solutions on the south. He vetoed a number of radical programs. He thought they interfered 5 with rights given to the states by the Constitution.
I'm Harry 6 Monroe. Today, Kay Gallant 7 and I continue the story of President Andrew Johnson.
VOICE TWO:
In the congressional elections of eighteen sixty-six, radicals 8 won firm control of both houses of Congress. They were able to pass a number of bills over the president's veto. But Johnson refused to stand aside in the face of radical attempts to seize all powers of government.
This conflict between Johnson and the Congress caused much bitterness. Finally, the radicals decided 9 to get him out of the way. For the first time in American history, Congress would try to remove the President from office.
Under the United States Constitution, the House of Representatives has the power to bring charges against the president. The Senate acts as the jury to decide if the President is guilty of the charges. The Chief Justice of the United States serves as judge.
If two-thirds of the Senators find the President guilty, he can be removed from office.
VOICE ONE:
Radicals in the House of Representatives brought eleven charges against President Johnson.
Most of the charges were based on Johnson's removal from office of his Secretary of War. Radicals charged that this violated a new law. The law said the President could not remove a cabinet officer without approval by the Senate.
Johnson refused to recognize the law. He said it was not constitutional.
Radicals in the House of Representatives also charged Johnson with criticizing Congress. They said his statements dishonored Congress and the presidency 11.
VOICE TWO:
The great impeachment trial began on March fifth, eighteen sixty-eight. The President refused to attend. But his lawyers were there to defend him.
One by one, the Senators swore an oath to be just. They promised to make a fair and honest decision on the guilt 10 or innocence 12 of Andrew Johnson.
A Congressman 13 from Massachusetts opened the case for the radicals. He told the Senators not to think of themselves as members of any court. He said the Senate was a political body that was being asked to settle a political question. Was Johnson the right man for the White House. He said it was clear that Johnson wanted to overthrow 14 Congress.
Other radical Republicans then joined him in condemning 15 Johnson. They made many charges. But they offered little evidence to support the charges.
VOICE ONE:
Johnson's lawyers called for facts, instead of emotion. They said the Constitution required the radicals to prove that the president had committed serious crimes. Andrew Johnson had committed no crime, they said. This was purely 16 a political trial.
They warned of serious damage to the American form of government if the resident was removed for political reasons. No future president would be safe, they said, if opposed by a majority of the House and two-thirds of the Senate.
VOICE TWO:
The trial went on day after day. The decision would be close. Fifty-four Senators would be voting. Thirty-six votes of "guilty" were needed to remove the President from office.
It soon became clear that the radicals had thirty-five of these votes. Only seven Senators remained undecided. If one of the seven voted guilty, Johnson would be removed.
Radicals put great pressure on the seven men. They tried to buy their votes. Party leaders threatened them. Supporters in the Senators' home states were told to write hundreds of letters demanding that Johnson be found guilty.
VOICE ONE:
A Senator from Maine was one who felt the pressure. But he refused to let it force him to do what others wished. He answered one letter this way:
"Sir, I wish you and all my other friends to know that I, not they, am sitting in judgment 17 upon the President. I, not they, have sworn to do impartial 18 justice. I, not they, am responsible to God and man for my action and its results."
A Snator from Kansas was another who refused to let pressure decide his vote. He said, "I trust that I shall have the courage to vote as I judge best."
VOICE TWO:
In the final days before the vote, six of the seven remaining Republican Senators let it be known that they would vote "not guilty." But the Senator from Kansas still refused to say what his vote would be. is was the only vote still in question. His vote would decide the issue.
Now, the pressure on him increased. His brother was offered twenty thousand dollars for information about how the Senator would vote. Everywhere he turned, he found someone demanding that he vote "guilty."
The vote took place on May sixteenth. Every seat in the big Senate room was filled. The Chief Justice began to call on the Senators. One by one, they answered "guilty" or "not guilty." Finally, he called the name of the Senator from Kansas.
VOICE ONE:
The senator stood up. He looked about him. Every voice was still. Every eye was upon him.
"It was like looking down into an open grave," he said later. "Friendship, position, wealth -- everything that makes life desirable to an ambitious man -- were about to be swept away by my answer."
He spoke 19 softly. Many could not hear him. The Chief Justice asked him to repeat his vote. This time, the answer was clearly heard across the room: "not guilty."
VOICE TWO:
The trial was all but done. Remaining Senators voted as expected. The Chief justice announced the result. On the first charge, thirty-five Senators voted that President Johnson was guilty. Nineteen voted that he was not guilty. The radicals had failed by
one vote.
When the Senate voted on the other charges, the result was the same. The radicals could not get the two-thirds majority they needed. President Johnson was declared "not guilty."
VOICE ONE:
Radical leaders and newspapers bitterly denounced the small group of Republican Senators who refused to vote guilty. They called them traitors 20. Friends and supporters condemned 21 them. None was re-elected to the Senate or to any other government
office.
It was a heavy price to pay. And yet, they were sure they had done the right thing. The Senator from Kansas told his wife, "The millions of men cursing me today will bless me tomorrow for having saved the country from the greatest threat it ever faced."
VOICE TWO:
He was right. The trial of Andrew Johnson was an important turning-point in the making of the American nation.
His removal from office would have established the idea that the President could serve only with the approval of Congress. The President would have become, in effect, a Prime Minister. He would have to depend on the support of Congress to remain
in office. Johnson's victory kept alive the idea of an independent presidency.
However, the vote did not end the conflict between Congress and the White House over the future of the south. That will be our story in the next program of THE MAKING OF A NATION.
(MUSIC)
VOICE ONE:
You have been listening to the Special English program, THE MAKING OF A NATION. Your narrators were Harry Monroe and Kay Gallant. Our program was written by David Jarmul and Frank Beardsley.
(MUSIC)
- Impeachment is considered a drastic measure in the United States.在美国,弹劾被视为一种非常激烈的措施。
- The verdict resulting from his impeachment destroyed his political career.他遭弹劾后得到的判决毁了他的政治生涯。
- The patient got a radical cure in the hospital.病人在医院得到了根治。
- She is radical in her demands.她的要求十分偏激。
- After the earthquake only a few houses were left standing.地震过后只有几幢房屋还立着。
- They're standing out against any change in the law.他们坚决反对对法律做任何修改。
- The Democrat and the Public criticized each other.民主党人和共和党人互相攻击。
- About two years later,he was defeated by Democrat Jimmy Carter.大约两年后,他被民主党人杰米卡特击败。
- Complete absorption in sports interfered with his studies. 专注于运动妨碍了他的学业。 来自《简明英汉词典》
- I am not going to be interfered with. 我不想别人干扰我的事情。 来自《简明英汉词典》
- Today,people feel more hurried and harried.今天,人们感到更加忙碌和苦恼。
- Obama harried business by Healthcare Reform plan.奥巴马用医改掠夺了商界。
- Huang Jiguang's gallant deed is known by all men. 黄继光的英勇事迹尽人皆知。
- These gallant soldiers will protect our country.这些勇敢的士兵会保卫我们的国家的。
- Some militant leaders want to merge with white radicals. 一些好斗的领导人要和白人中的激进派联合。 来自《简明英汉词典》
- The worry is that the radicals will grow more intransigent. 现在人们担忧激进分子会变得更加不妥协。 来自辞典例句
- This gave them a decided advantage over their opponents.这使他们比对手具有明显的优势。
- There is a decided difference between British and Chinese way of greeting.英国人和中国人打招呼的方式有很明显的区别。
- She tried to cover up her guilt by lying.她企图用谎言掩饰自己的罪行。
- Don't lay a guilt trip on your child about schoolwork.别因为功课责备孩子而使他觉得很内疚。
- Roosevelt was elected four times to the presidency of the United States.罗斯福连续当选四届美国总统。
- Two candidates are emerging as contestants for the presidency.两位候选人最终成为总统职位竞争者。
- There was a touching air of innocence about the boy.这个男孩有一种令人感动的天真神情。
- The accused man proved his innocence of the crime.被告人经证实无罪。
- He related several anecdotes about his first years as a congressman.他讲述自己初任议员那几年的几则轶事。
- The congressman is meditating a reply to his critics.这位国会议员正在考虑给他的批评者一个答复。
- After the overthrow of the government,the country was in chaos.政府被推翻后,这个国家处于混乱中。
- The overthrow of his plans left him much discouraged.他的计划的失败使得他很气馁。
- The government issued a statement condemning the killings. 政府发表声明谴责这些凶杀事件。
- I concur with the speaker in condemning what has been done. 我同意发言者对所做的事加以谴责。 来自《现代英汉综合大词典》
- I helped him purely and simply out of friendship.我帮他纯粹是出于友情。
- This disproves the theory that children are purely imitative.这证明认为儿童只会单纯地模仿的理论是站不住脚的。
- The chairman flatters himself on his judgment of people.主席自认为他审视人比别人高明。
- He's a man of excellent judgment.他眼力过人。
- He gave an impartial view of the state of affairs in Ireland.他对爱尔兰的事态发表了公正的看法。
- Careers officers offer impartial advice to all pupils.就业指导员向所有学生提供公正无私的建议。
- They sourced the spoke nuts from our company.他们的轮辐螺帽是从我们公司获得的。
- The spokes of a wheel are the bars that connect the outer ring to the centre.辐条是轮子上连接外圈与中心的条棒。