时间:2019-02-19 作者:英语课 分类:听播客学英语


英语课

   I am sorry that there has not been a podcast for the last two weeks. We have been very busy in this country. We have had a General Election and now we have a new government.


  Many countries have electoral systems that we call, in English, “proportional representation”. In these systems, the number of seats which each political party has in the Parliament reflects the number of votes which they get in the election. So, if the Red Party gets 50% of the votes, it will get 50% of the seats; if the Green Party gets 20% of the votes, it will get 20% of the seats, and so on. But in Britain we think this is too easy. Our arrangements are much more fun. We have a system called “first past the post”.
  “What is he talking about?” I hear you say. “What is this first past the post?”. Imagine a donkey race. The donkeys run round the race track. Some of them fall over. Some of them decide that donkey races are boring and stop running. But the other donkeys keep going. At the end of the race course, there is a post stuck in the ground. The first donkey that passes the winning post is the winner. All the other donkeys are losers. That is what “first past the post” means. It means that British elections are like donkey races.
  Or, rather, they are like 650 different donkey races, all on the same day. Britain is divided into 650 constituencies. In each constituency, the candidate who gets most votes becomes the new Member of Parliament. It doesn’t matter whether he or she gets 90% of the votes or only 25% of the votes – if they get more votes than anyone else, they have won.
  This is what happened in the constituency where I live. Several donkeys decided 1 to run. There was a red donkey, who was the Member of Parliament in the old Parliament, a blue donkey, a yellow donkey and a green donkey, and a few other donkeys who knew they couldn’t win but thought it might be fun to take part. The yellow donkey was the one who made the most noise. He was sure that he would win. Every day he sent us leaflets or letters to say that he was the only donkey who could beat the red donkey. Voting for the blue donkey was a waste of time, he said. She could not win. And the other donkeys? He ignored them. They did not matter.
  On election night, the votes were counted. The red donkey had won again. And close behind him was – big surprise! – the green donkey, and a long way behind that was the yellow donkey. The supporters of the red donkey cheered. The supporters of the green donkey were pleased that she had done so well. And people who had bet that the yellow donkey would win had lost their money, and felt cross and foolish.
  Now, I am sure that you will agree that this way of holding an election is much more fun than proportional representation. Unfortunately, it is also not at all democratic, because the “first past the post” system favours the big political parties. So, for example, in this election the Liberal Democrat 2 party (the yellow donkey party) won 23% of the votes across the country as a whole, but has only 9% of the seats in Parliament. But, say the big parties, the “first past the post” system gives us strong, stable governments with a majority of seats in Parliament.
  This election was different, however. No party will have a majority in the new Parliament. So, what would happen? The different parties started to negotiate with each other, and this gave us several more days of fun and excitement. The leader of the yellow donkeys (Mr Nick Clegg) talked first to the leader of the blue donkeys (Mr David Cameron) and then to the red donkey party and then to the blue donkey party again. (The blue donkey party and the red donkey party never talk to each another – that is a fundamental rule of British politics). Then the blue donkeys and the yellow donkeys announced that they had reached an agreement, and they would be the next government.
  Will they be happy together in the same stable? Or will they soon start kicking each other? We shall see!

adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的
  • This gave them a decided advantage over their opponents.这使他们比对手具有明显的优势。
  • There is a decided difference between British and Chinese way of greeting.英国人和中国人打招呼的方式有很明显的区别。
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员
  • The Democrat and the Public criticized each other.民主党人和共和党人互相攻击。
  • About two years later,he was defeated by Democrat Jimmy Carter.大约两年后,他被民主党人杰米卡特击败。
标签: 英语播客
学英语单词
acropora sarmentosa
along track
aluminium framing strips
angulus superior pyramidis ossis temporalis
annual contribution
application of glaze
baby-shower
Bahaism, Baha'ism
barbershop quartet singing
bat fly
be on one's uppers
bent antenna
Bi'r al Ghanam
bischofia trifoliata hook.
bought invoice book
brake pipe compensating valve
break ground and start building
Bricker operation
Bullet strategy
channel borrowing
choline kinase
cinescintigram
circular path
clarties
coke knocker
contraints
cyclic digital telemetering (cdt)
deka-newtons
di-iodotyrosines
Dies Irae, Diesirae
dulse
E &. OE
electro-hydraulic power steering
electromagnetic deflection
f.o.r.
factorial symbol
family Volvariaceae
fixed control storage
flesographigcally
Flexibacter
format codes
Fortunella
fox
frieri
glass-cleaner
global circulation
grease mark
grid coil
halogeno-sugar
hot-beds
hot-weather trial
immunoresistance
input aerial
insulation factor
intercrystalline rupture
kaberry
Kapurthala
killick
legally filing the award
Logan Rock
logistic cost
marine pollution aspect
minimally almost periodic group
natural varnish
nemipterus virgatus
night-vision telescope
organization effect (levitan 1954)
panayiotis
Pelopidas mathias
pittston
polymer science
proliferation of synovial fringes
psychology of knowing
radial layout
radial-knife cutterhead
rami circumflexus
re-surveillance
reelects
replacement tooth
Rhodoid
riboflavine phosphate(sodium)
semparatide
share name
short-range characteristics
special program code
split beginning operation
Stellaria pilosa
strategic ballistic missile
stratum basales
student mortality
sub-post
tax income
threshold value
thrips simplex
Tianshu
tie hoop
totus
transmission bridge circuit
under-voltage test
validity problem
wfsp